post graduate DIP.ED. PORTFOLIO 
 

DAYLE JOGIE 

SECTION F - REFLECTIVE SUMMARY

CAPTION 

The Pedagogy as Process portfolio is an encapsulation of core concepts and methodologies that were taught in the Diploma in Education.  In this section, I summarize what I have learnt after completing each component of the portfolio.  I also reflect on personal ideologies and philosophies as an educator, as well as my projected use of pedagogical strategies in the future.  The portfolio comprehensively assesses various processes associated with praxis, uniting theoretical and practical aspects of education.  This entry elucidates, how I have been inspired to engage in a community of practices, as well as more meaningful pedagogical strategies.

REFLECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY

The Pedagogy as Process (PAP) course is aimed at allowing the teacher to merge theory and practice, also known as praxis.  This online portfolio is a requirement of the course and consists of unit and lesson plans, reports, descriptions, personal reflections and digital media files.  Pedagogy is related to the science of teaching, and after attending the Diploma in Education (DipEd) programme, I believe that praxis is essential for teachers who aspire to become successful practitioners.  This course has developed me both personally and professionally, and there is much learning that I have gained from it. 

PAP emphasizes preparation, planning, collaboration, technology integration and self-reflection.  I have learnt about the construction of proper unit and lesson plans, and alignment of content with curriculum objectives.  I was fascinated by the concept of the learning hierarchy, which yields a holistic view of unit content from a bottom to top approach.  Thus, connections between interdependent topics can be easily viewed by the practitioner, transmitting to enhanced curriculum delivery throughout each unit.  This is also related to the idea of scaffolding, whereby the teacher can see which basic concepts should be introduced, before delving into abstract material.  PAP encourages the teacher to be student-centered, and to structure lessons using methods and strategies that can capture the students’ attention and improve learning.  That is, emphasis is not necessarily on how much content is covered by the teacher, but rather on how much content is retained by the student.

Part of my learning experience involved curriculum integration with other disciplines.  This was quite eye-opening, as I previously assumed that multidisciplinary approaches were not necessary for student development.  However, after collaborating with a Geography teacher regarding a coordinate geometry lesson, it was immediately apparent that students’ interest may increase, since the lesson showed a practical application of mathematics.  In retrospect, there have been numerable occasions in my career where students have questioned me regarding the need for mathematics in real life.  Due to curriculum integration, students can naturally see that mathematics is a relatable and relevant subject.

Due to this course, I have also learnt to create assessments which are fairer, valid and more reliable.  Using Tables of Specification, I am better equipped in aligning class tests with curriculum objectives.  Of course, this suggests that much preparation must be expended for setting a quality exam, but the benefits of creating a valid test justifies such efforts.   

PAP also emphasized the use of technology in the classroom, and this was tenable since technology was used for online teaching throughout the pandemic.  As a teacher, I had developed various technological skills for online delivery, prior to attending the DipEd programme.  The DipEd has polished some of my strategies, as I am now able to align technical savvy with traditional teaching elements.

My initial philosophy as a teacher was comparable to a tour guide.  The ethos of this metaphor lies in guiding students through their mathematical journey.  I still embrace this metaphor, but I also have realized that much of my previous praxis was teacher rather than student-centered.  That is, my stance on teaching primarily lay in syllabus completion; covering content using direct teaching methods and then assessing summatively.  The PAP course has taught me to re-evaluate my teaching strategies, and allow students to participate in their own learning.  Thus, I am now mindful of being a guide in the classroom, while simultaneously creating innovative lesson plans for delivery.  I now see that pedagogy is not solely about delivering content, but in developing students holistically.  Through much reflection, I have seen that I am an agent of change.  Today’s students will be tomorrow’s educators, and it is my duty as a teacher to facilitate the best quality of teaching possible.  For secondary school students, navigating through the obstacles of academic life can be quite daunting.  Through the DipEd programme, I now visualize myself as a game changer, and will strive to get polish my students, so that they can be game changers in the future.